This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 1659–1676, doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.158
Figure 1: Schematic setups studied in this paper. a) S–QD–TS geometry: S denotes a conventional s-wave BCS su...
Figure 2: Phase dependence of the subgap spectrum of an S–QD–TS junction in the noninteracting case, U = 0. T...
Figure 3: Phase-dependent ABS spectrum from mean-field theory for S–QD–TS junctions as in Figure 2 but with U > 0 and...
Figure 4: Main panel: Mean-field results for the CPR of S–QD–TS junctions with different Γ/Δ values, where we...
Figure 5: Main panel: Mean-field results for the critical current Ic vs local magnetic field scale Bx in S–QD...
Figure 6: Main panel: Critical current Ic vs Zeeman energy Vx for an S–TS junction using the spinful TS nanow...
Figure 7: CPR for the S–TS junction with = 1 in Figure 6, for different bulk Zeeman fields Vx (in meV) near the crit...
Figure 8: Main panel: Critical current Ic vs Zeeman energy Vx for S–QD–TS junctions from mean-field theory us...
Figure 9: Main panel: Mean-field results for Ic vs Bz in S–QD–TS junctions for several values of ΓS = ΓTS = Γ...